Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Petra Piperati's avatar

I felt that part in my back teeth. Twenty years of office life and what I remember most clearly is how fast good work goes in the bin. And how quietly. It gets agreed to death, and the meeting moves on to the next item.

Jenny Schmitt, PhD | BrandLab's avatar

This is such a good description of the part of leadership nobody romanticizes.

Killing something after a year of work is not the hard part because the numbers are unclear. Sometimes the numbers are painfully clear. The hard part is that the decision can be right and still feel like failure to everyone who built it.

What Neil did well here, to me, was separate the quality of the decision from the outcome that preceded it. He didn’t pretend the project was fine. He didn’t erase the mistakes. He just recognized that you had done the work necessary to make a hard decision properly.

That matters more than people think, because otherwise teams learn a very dangerous lesson: that the only work worth being proud of is work that survives.

I’ve seen companies burn astonishing amounts of money because nobody wanted to be the person who said, “we have learned enough; stop.”

I’m curious, looking back now, do you think there was a moment earlier in the project when it should have been killed? Or was the real failure not stopping sooner, but not having a clear enough mechanism for deciding when “one more push” had become sunk-cost thinking?

14 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?